US to Strengthen Forces to Counter Iran05/25 11:06
The U.S. will send hundreds of additional troops and a dozen fighter jets to
the Middle East in the coming weeks to counter what the Pentagon said is an
escalating campaign by Iran to plan attacks against the U.S. and its interests
in the region. And for the first time, Pentagon officials on Friday publicly
blamed Iran and its proxies for recent tanker bombings near United Arab
Emirates and a rocket attack in Iraq.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The U.S. will send hundreds of additional troops and a
dozen fighter jets to the Middle East in the coming weeks to counter what the
Pentagon said is an escalating campaign by Iran to plan attacks against the
U.S. and its interests in the region. And for the first time, Pentagon
officials on Friday publicly blamed Iran and its proxies for recent tanker
bombings near United Arab Emirates and a rocket attack in Iraq.
President Donald Trump told reporters Friday that the 1,500 troops would
have a "mostly protective" role as part of a build-up that began this month in
response to what the U.S said was a threat from Iran.
The announcement caps three weeks of elevated tensions with Iran, as the
administration hurled accusations of an imminent attack and abruptly deployed
Navy warships to the region. The moves alarmed members of Congress, who
demanded proof and details, amid fears the U.S. was lurching toward open
conflict with Iran.
Adding to the uncertainty, Trump alternated between tough talk toward Iran
and a more conciliatory message, insisting he is open to negotiations with the
On Friday he seemed to downplay the prospect of conflict when he spoke at
the White House.
"Right now, I don't think Iran wants to fight and I certainly don't think
they want to fight with us," he said.
In a related move, the Trump administration on Friday used an emergency
legal loophole to move ahead with the sale of $7 billion in precision-guided
munitions and other military support to Saudi Arabia, citing threats the
kingdom faces from Iran.
Vice Admiral Michael Gilday told Pentagon reporters that the U.S. has "very
high confidence" that Iran's Revolutionary Guard was responsible for the
explosions on four tankers, and that Iranian proxies in Iraq fired rockets into
Baghdad. He said Iran also tried to deploy modified small boats that were
capable of launching cruise missiles.
The deployments announced Friday include a squadron of 12 fighter jets,
manned and unmanned surveillance aircraft, and a number of military engineers
to beef up protection for forces. In addition a battalion of four Patriot
missile batteries that was scheduled to leave the Middle East has been ordered
to stay. The total number of troops involved is about 1,500, with roughly 600
included in the Patriot battalion. None of those troops will go to either Iraq
"We are going to be sending a relatively small number of troops, mostly
protective," the president said at the White House before setting off on a trip
to Japan. "Some very talented people are going to the Middle East right now and
we'll see what happens."
Briefing reporters at the Pentagon, Gilday, the Joint Staff director, did
not provide direct evidence to back up claims tying Iran to the attacks. He
told reporters the conclusions were based on intelligence and evidence gathered
in the region, and officials said they are trying to declassify some of the
information so that it could be made public.
"This is truly operations driven by intelligence," Gilday said, adding that
the U.S. continues to see intelligence suggesting that Iran is actively
planning attacks against the U.S. and partners in the region by the
Revolutionary Guard and Iranian proxies in Yemen and Iraq.
When pressed for proof of Iran's involvement, he said the mines used in the
tanker attacks were attributed directly to the Revolutionary Guard and he said
threats could be traced back to senior leaders in Iran.
"I'm not reverse engineering this," he said. "The Iranians have said
publicly they were going to do things. We learn more through intelligence
reporting. They have acted upon those threats and they've actually attacked."
The announcement of additional forces was met with mixed reviews.
The chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Democrat Adam Smith of
Washington, called the build-up "unsettling."
"Leaders from both sides of the aisle have called for de-escalation. At
first blush, this move does not fit the bill," Smith said in a statement
Friday. "Without a clearly articulated strategy, adding more personnel and
mission systems seems unwise, and appears to be a blatant and heavy-handed move
to further escalate tensions with Iran."
The senior Republican on the committee, Mac Thornberry of Texas, called it
"a prudent step to protect our forces and deter Iran," and said requests from
commanders should "never be subject to a partisan debate."
The administration notified Congress earlier in the day about the troop
Gilday and Katie Wheelbarger, the acting assistant defense secretary for
international affairs, said the mission is strictly defensive, and is not
designed to provoke Iran into carrying out additional attacks. They said the
Pentagon will continue to evaluate the number of troops in the region in case
more are needed later.
Earlier this week, officials said military planners had outlined options
that could have sent up to 10,000 military reinforcements to the region. Acting
Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan later said planners hadn't settled on a
The U.S. has about 70,000 troops across the Middle East, including at a
major Navy base in Bahrain and an Air Force base and operations center in
Qatar. There are about 5,200 troops in Iraq and 2,000 in Syria.
Earlier this month, the U.S. sent thousands more into the region around
Iran, including an aircraft carrier strike group, four bomber aircraft, a
Patriot missile battery and fighter jets.
Tension had been rising with Iran for more than a year. The Trump
administration withdrew last year from the 2015 nuclear deal between the
Islamic Republic and world powers and reinstated American sanctions that have
badly damaged the Iranian economy.
The president has argued that the nuclear deal failed to sufficiently curb
Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons or halt its support for militias
throughout the Middle East that the U.S. argues destabilize the region.